Pii: S0144-8188(00)00033-8
نویسندگان
چکیده
Froeb and Kobayashi (1996) find that endogenous expenditure decisions at trial tend to eliminate an exogenously given jury bias. For interior solutions, they find the initial bias to be totally eliminated. We find, however, that once the participation constraint of the plaintiff and defendant are taken into account, strong priors by the jury tend to deteriorate the quality of the cases which are filed by the plaintiff and defended by the defendant. We also explore an alternative form for jury bias, and find that it is generally non-neutral with respect to the trial outcome. Further, we find that the use of the English rule may exacerbate the effects of a strong jury bias. © 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
Pii: S0144-8188(00)00019-3
Plaintiffs have either developed or less developed cases. Both cases should be taken to court, yet less developed cases need more work by the attorney than developed cases. Only the attorney knows whether a case needs additional work or not; the plaintiff is forced to rely on the attorney’s recommendation. We show that under contingent fees attorneys may provide insufficient effort, i.e., they ...
متن کاملPii: S0144-8188(00)00026-0
In this paper, we examine the economics of Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, whereby the negotiation processes at the pretrial stage are made inadmissible to prove the amount of liability. It is asserted that under Rule 408 a settlement offer is less inclined to be rejected since the judge is expected to make a lower award given the signal he observes. Also, we derive a sufficient cond...
متن کاملPii: S0144-8188(00)00030-2
This article analyzes for the pharmaceutical market in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Japan: (a) the determinants of generic entry; (b) the determinants of the entry lag when there is generic entry; and (c) the impact on original brand sales of generic entry. The results suggest that the larger the market, the greater is the probability of both generic entry and the subsequ...
متن کاملPii: S0144-8188(00)00049-1
The purpose of the present paper is to explore both the motivation for confiscating illegal gain and also to look at some of its legal aspects and economic effects. It is argued that the removal of illegal gain may be able to play a significant complementary role, if only by closing the gap between the maximum punishment the law will allow and fines sufficient to represent a credible deterrent....
متن کاملPii: S0144-8188(00)00022-3
Our study is based on the traditional Becker-Ehrlich deterrence model, but we analyze the model in the face of currently discussed factors of crime like demographic changes, youth unemployment, and income inequality. We use a panel of the German Laender (states) that allows us to exploit different experiences in densely and sparsely populated areas as well as areas in East and West Germany. Our...
متن کامل